MARTIN v. LANDRY
Filing
15
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 11 Report and Recommendations for 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by CHRISTOPHER R MARTIN. No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
CHRISTOPHER R. MARTIN,
PETITIONER
V.
SCOTT LANDRY,
RESPONDENT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL NO. 2:14-CV-439-DBH
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION
OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On March 27, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the
court, with a copy to the petitioner and the Office of the Attorney General, his
Recommended Decision on 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Motion. The petitioner filed his
objection to the Recommended Decision on April 27, 2015. I have reviewed and
considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have
made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended
Decisions; and I concur with the recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision, and
determine that no further proceeding is necessary.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate
Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The petitioner’s motion is DISMISSED.
I find that no certificate of appealability, pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules
Governing Section 2254 Cases, shall issue because there is no substantial
showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(2).
SO ORDERED.
DATED THIS 5TH DAY OF MAY, 2015
/S/D. BROCK HORNBY
D. BROCK HORNBY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?