BARRY v. CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES et al

Filing 148

ORDER ADOPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 108 Motion for Summary Judgment; 112 Motion for Summary Judgment; 120 Motion for Summary Judgment; 135 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (mjlt)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
PAUL MICHAEL BARRY,
Plaintiff,
v.
CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES,
et al., 1
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:14-cv-00527-JDL

ORDER ADOPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge filed his Recommended Decision (ECF No.
135) with the court on July 29, 2016, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). The plaintiff, Paul Michael Barry, filed an Objection
to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 143) on September 20, 2016. The defendants
filed Responses to the plaintiff’s Objection (ECF No. 144, ECF No. 146) on September
21, 2016 and October 7, 2016.
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended
Decision, together with the entire record, and have made a de novo determination of
all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision. I concur

1

In their initial Motion to Dismiss, Corizon pointed out that its correct name is Corizon, LLC, and
that it had been misnamed in the complaint. See ECF No. 21 at 1. However, in the absence of a
request from the parties, I have maintained the case caption as it exists in ECF.

with the Magistrate Judge’s conclusions as set forth in his Recommended Decision
and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate
Judge (ECF No. 135) is hereby ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment
(ECF No. 120) is DENIED. The defendants’ motions for summary judgment (ECF
No. 108 and ECF No. 112) are GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.
Dated this 14th day of November 2016

/s/ Jon D. Levy
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

2