E v. ANTHEM BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD

Filing 46

PROCEDURAL ORDER The parties shall respond to this order by June 14, 2016 By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (dfr)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ADELE E., PLAINTIFF V. ANTHEM BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD, DEFENDANT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 2:15-CV-01-DBH PROCEDURAL ORDER I have read the parties’ submissions on how much Anthem should pay for the plaintiff’s stay at RainRock and the calculation of prejudgment interest. I still cannot tell from the submissions when the plaintiff actually paid RainRock and whether that bill has been paid in full or whether the plaintiff has negotiated some sort of payment plan. That may bear upon my calculation of prejudgment interest. I also recognize the dispute over the different rates RainRock charges Anthem and what it charges an individual, but I cannot tell on this record whether RainRock has actually collected the higher rate from the plaintiff. The parties shall respond to this order by June 14, 2016. SO ORDERED. DATED THIS 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 2016 /S/D. BROCK HORNBY D. BROCK HORNBY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE i

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?