E v. ANTHEM BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD
Filing
46
PROCEDURAL ORDER The parties shall respond to this order by June 14, 2016 By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (dfr)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
ADELE E.,
PLAINTIFF
V.
ANTHEM BLUE CROSS AND BLUE
SHIELD,
DEFENDANT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL NO. 2:15-CV-01-DBH
PROCEDURAL ORDER
I have read the parties’ submissions on how much Anthem should pay for
the plaintiff’s stay at RainRock and the calculation of prejudgment interest. I
still cannot tell from the submissions when the plaintiff actually paid RainRock
and whether that bill has been paid in full or whether the plaintiff has negotiated
some sort of payment plan. That may bear upon my calculation of prejudgment
interest. I also recognize the dispute over the different rates RainRock charges
Anthem and what it charges an individual, but I cannot tell on this record
whether RainRock has actually collected the higher rate from the plaintiff. The
parties shall respond to this order by June 14, 2016.
SO ORDERED.
DATED THIS 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 2016
/S/D. BROCK HORNBY
D. BROCK HORNBY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
i
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?