LANE v. LANDRY
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 36 Report and Recommendations and dismissing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0.; By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (mjlt)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
JOHN AMOS LANE,
Docket No. 2:15-cv-036-NT
ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on 28 U.S.C. §
2254 his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 36). I have reviewed and considered
the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, together with the entire
record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the
Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the
recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set
forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding
1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the
Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.
2. It is further ORDERED that the Petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Petition (ECF No. 1) be and hereby is DISMISSED with prejudice.
3. It is further ORDERED that no certificate of appealability should
issue in the event the Plaintiff files a notice of appeal because there
is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right
within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
/s/ Nancy Torresen_______________
United States Chief District Judge
Dated: May 9, 2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?