INMAN v. RIEBE et al

Filing 28

ORDER adopting 22 Report and Recommended Decision for 7 Motion for Bail filed by FRANK INMAN; denying 7 Motion for Bail. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE FRANK INMAN, Plaintiff, v. WENDY RIEBE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:15-cv-00080-JAW ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on June 2, 2015 his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 22). The Plaintiff filed his objections to the Recommended Decision on June 12, 2015 (ECF Nos. 24 and 25). I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 22) of the Magistrate Judge be and hereby is AFFIRMED. 2. It is further ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion for Bail (ECF No. 7) be and hereby is DENIED. SO ORDERED. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 7th day of July, 2015 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?