MORGAN v. COLVIN
Filing
104
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 99 Report and Recommendations and granting 63 Motion for Summary Judgment. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
District of Maine
KATHERINE MORGAN,
Plaintiff
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, in her
Official Capacity as Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 2:15-cv-00107-GZS
Defendant
ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on December 7, 2016, his
Recommended Decision (ECF No. 99). Plaintiff filed her Objection to the Recommended
Decision (ECF No. 100) on December 22, 2016. Defendant filed her Response to Plaintiff’s
Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 103) on January 12, 2017.
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together
with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the
Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United
States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine
that no further proceeding is necessary.
1.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge
is hereby AFFIRMED.
2.
Plaintiff having conceded that Defendant is entitled to summary judgment on
Counts II and III and having failed to make out a triable issue of the existence of a
materially adverse employment action with respect to Count I, it is hereby
ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 63) is
GRANTED,
/s/George Z. Singal_____________
U.S. District Judge
Dated this 23rd day of January, 2017.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?