COOMBS v. LANDRY et al
Filing
11
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 Report and Recommendations, dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint, and denying Plaintiff's 8 Motion to Amend Complaint. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
District of Maine
PATRICK S. COOMBS,
Plaintiff
v.
SCOTT LANDRY, et al.,,
Defendants
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 2:15-cv-00117-GZS
ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on April 13, 2015, his
Recommended Decision (ECF No. 5). Plaintiff filed his Objections to the Recommended Decision
(ECF Nos. 9 and 10) on May 4, 2015.
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together
with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the
Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United
States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine
that no further proceeding is necessary.
1.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge
is hereby AFFIRMED.
2.
It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED
pursuant to §1915(e)(2) and 29 U.S.C. §1915A(a).
3.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Complaint (ECF No. 8) is DENIED as it fails to cure
the defect in the initial Complaint.
/s/George Z. Singal_____________
U.S. District Judge
Dated this 5th day of May, 2015.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?