DOWEY v. MAINE, STATE OF

Filing 17

ORDER adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 15 Report and Recommendations. No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0.; denying 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (rmb)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
JOCELYN DOWEY,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF MAINE,
Respondent

)
)
)
)
) Docket no. 2:15-cv-138-NT
)
)
)
)

ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION
OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On September 15, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with
the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on the
Petitioner’s request for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Petitioner
filed an objection to the Recommended Decision on October 1, 2015. I have
reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire
record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the
Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the
United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the
Recommended Decision and determine that no further proceeding is
necessary.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the
Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that Petitioner’s
28 U.S.C. § 2254 Motion (ECF Nos. 2 and 2-1) is DENIED. It is ORDERED

that no certificate of appealibility shall issue because there is no substantial
showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28
U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Nancy Torresen
United States Chief District Judge
Dated this 16th day of October, 2015.

2