WORTHLEY v. ROBERTS et al
Filing
5
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2 Report and Recommendations and mooting 3 Motion to Amend. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
District of Maine
BRIAN WORTHLEY,
Plaintiff
v.
ASHLEY ROBERTS, et al.,
Defendant
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 2:15-cv-00207-GZS
ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on June 8, 2015, his
Recommended Decision (ECF No. 2). Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision
(ECF No. 4) on July 8, 2015.
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together
with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the
Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United
States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine
that no further proceeding is necessary.
1.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge
is hereby AFFIRMED.
2.
It is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Complaint (ECF No. 3) is
DISMISSED AS MOOT.
/s/George Z. Singal_____________
U.S. District Judge
Dated this 9th day of July, 2015.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?