INMAN v. LANDRY

Filing 21

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 Report and Recommendations, denying 10 Motion to Amend, and dismissing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
FRANK INMAN,
Petitioner,
v.
SCOTT LANDRY,
Respondent

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No.

2:15-cv-00243-GZS

ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended
Decision (Docket No. 14) filed October 22, 2015, the Recommended Decision is
AFFIRMED.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
(1) Petitioner’s Motion for Habeas Relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254 (ECF No. 1) is
hereby DISMISSED.
(2) A certificate of appealability is DENIED pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules
Governing Section 2254 cases because there is no substantial showing of the
denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(2).
(3) Petitioner’s Motion to Amend Petition (ECF No. 10) is DENIED.

_/s/ George Z. Singal
__
United States District Judge
Dated this 7th day of December, 2015.