GLADU v. ROSS et al

Filing 134

ORDER AFFIRMING RULINGS OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re Order No. 109 and Order No. 125 By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (jib)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
NICHOLAS A. GLADU,
PLAINTIFF
V.

TROY ROSS
GOWEN,

AND

CHRISTOPHER
DEFENDANTS

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL NO. 2:15-CV-274-DBH

ORDER AFFIRMING RULINGS OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On September 7, 2016, the United States Magistrate Judge entered an
Order denying in part the Plaintiff’s Motion for In Camera Review of Defendants’
Redacted Discovery Production (ECF No. 109). The plaintiff filed his objections
to the Magistrate Judge’s Order on September 26 (ECF No. 119) and October 13,
2016 (ECF No. 122).
On October 26, 2016, the United States Magistrate Judge entered an Order
After Further In Camera Review (ECF No. 125). Objections to the Magistrate
Judge’s Order were filed by the defendant Troy Ross on November 7 (ECF No.
127), and by the plaintiff on November 7, 2016 (ECF No. 128).
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Orders and the
parties’ objections. The parties’ objections are OVERRULED on the basis that the
Magistrate Judge’s rulings are neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a).
SO ORDERED.
DATED THIS 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2016
/S/D. BROCK HORNBY
D. BROCK HORNBY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE