ADAMS v. LANDRY et al

Filing 38

ORDER adopting 23 Report and Recommended Decision for 11 Motion for TRO, Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by JON R. ADAMS, 19 Motion for TRO, Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by JON R. ADAMS, and 21 Motion to Waive Post Security filed by JON R. ADAMS. Denying 11 Motion for TRO, Motion for Preliminary Injunction, denying 19 Motion for TRO, Motion for Preliminary Injunction, and dismissing as moot 21 Motion to Waive Post Security. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE JON R. ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT LANDRY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:15-cv-00282-JAW ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE No objection having been filed to the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision filed on August 31, 2015 (ECF No. 23), the Recommended Decision is accepted. The Court affirms the Recommended Decision for three reasons. First, Mr. Adams failed to object to it. Second, Mr. Adams has since moved to a recovery center, see Pl.’s Change of Address Notice (ECF No. 37), thereby rendering moot his request for injunctive relief to be assigned to a particular cell block. Finally, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s legal analysis and conclusion. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order/Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 11) and Plaintiff’s Second Motion for Temporary Restraining Order/Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 19) be and hereby are DENIED. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Waive Post Security (ECF No. 21) be and hereby is DISMISSED as moot. SO ORDERED. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 15th day of December, 2015 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?