DEMOS v. UNITED STATES PRESIDENT
Filing
6
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 4 Report and Recommendations. No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mjlt)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.,
PETITIONER
V.
UNITED STATES PRESIDENT,
RESPONDENT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL NO. 2:15-CR-284-DBH
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION
OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On July 24, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court,
with a copy to the petitioner, his Recommended Decision on the petition for writ
of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The petitioner filed his objection to
the Recommended Decision on August 13, 2015. I have reviewed and considered
the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de
novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision;
and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge
for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision, and determine that no
further proceeding is necessary.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate
Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The petition is DISMISSED. To the extent that the
petitioner’s petition is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 2254, I DENY a certificate of
appealability pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases
because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right
within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
SO ORDERED.
DATED THIS 14TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015
/S/D. BROCK HORNBY
D. BROCK HORNBY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?