MURRAY v. WAL-MART STORES INC et al

Filing 169

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION denying 157 Objection to Order on Pending Motions. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (jib)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
DAVID E. MURRAY,
PLAINTIFF
V.

WAL-MART STORES, INC.,

ET AL.,

DEFENDANTS

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL NO. 2:15-CV-484-DBH

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
The plaintiff has filed an “Objection to Courts’ Decision” attacking my
ruling of September 24, 2018. I will treat it as a motion for reconsideration, and
the motion for reconsideration is DENIED. The defendants say that it is moot
because the deposition has now occurred.

Whether or not it is moot, the

plaintiff’s arguments do not persuade me that my original ruling is incorrect and
should be reconsidered.
SO ORDERED.
DATED THIS 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2018
/S/D. BROCK HORNBY
D. BROCK HORNBY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE