MURRAY v. WAL-MART STORES INC et al

Filing 214

ORDER AFFIRMING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDER AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR STAY re Overruling 210 Objection ; denying 211 Motion to Stay By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (clp)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
DAVID E. MURRAY,
PLAINTIFF
V.

WAL-MART STORES, INC.,

ET AL.,

DEFENDANTS

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL NO. 2:15-CV-484-DBH

ORDER AFFIRMING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S ORDER
AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR STAY
On June 5, 2019, the United States Magistrate Judge entered an Order
denying the plaintiff’s motion for leave to file additional statements of material
facts. The plaintiff filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge’s ruling on June 6,
2019.

I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Order, and I

concur with the Magistrate Judge’s Order because it is neither clearly erroneous
nor contrary to law, and I determine that no further proceeding is necessary.
The plaintiff’s objection is OVERRULED and the Magistrate Judge’s Order is
AFFIRMED because the Order is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a).1
The plaintiff’s motion for a stay of all deadlines is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
DATED THIS 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2019
/S/D. BROCK HORNBY
D. BROCK HORNBY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1

I would reach the same conclusion following a de novo review under Rule 72(b).