CARSON et al v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC et al

Filing 85

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENT TO AMENDED COMPLAINT re 69 Motion for Leave to File By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (jib)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE BERNARD AND NANCY CARSON, PLAINTIFFS V. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC, THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON F/K/A THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS SUCCESSOR TO TRUSTEE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF POPULAR ABS, INC. MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES 2005-C, LITTON LOAN SERVICING LP, DEFENDANTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 2:15-CV-514-DBH ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENT TO AMENDED COMPLAINT The plaintiffs’ motion to supplement their amended complaint to include events occurring after it was filed (ECF No. 69) is GRANTED. It is apparent that the court has broad discretion in this regard, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(d); United States ex rel. Gadbois v. PharMerica Corp., 809 F.3d 1, 4–6 (1st Cir. 2015); 6A Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1510 (3d ed. 1998). My earlier ruling on summary judgment (ECF No. 65) will apply equally to the Supplemented First Amended Complaint. I also GRANT the defendants’ request for 45 days additional discovery on the new allegations (ECF No.82). Accordingly the case will be removed from the August jury trial calendar and moved to the September calendar. SO ORDERED. DATED THIS 25TH DAY OF MAY, 2017 /S/D. BROCK HORNBY D. BROCK HORNBY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?