MARTELL v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Filing
21
ORDER re: 20 Motion to Remand By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN H. RICH III. (ccs)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
CHRISTIN MARTELL,
Plaintiff
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner,
Social Security Administration,
Defendant
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 2:16-cv-65-JHR
ORDER
Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing
the Commissioner’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section
205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of the government’s request to
remand this action for further administrative proceedings by the Appeals Council,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be remanded to the Social Security
Administration for further administrative proceedings. Upon the remand of this case by the Court,
the Appeals Council will remand it to an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) for a de novo hearing
and decision. On remand, the Appeals Council will direct the ALJ to further evaluate Plaintiff’s
educational level; and obtain supplemental vocational expert testimony to determine if there are a
substantial number of jobs Plaintiff can perform in the national economy.
THEREFORE, this court hereby reverses the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four
of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner for further proceedings.
See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). The
1
clerk of the court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure.
SO ORDERED this 29th day of August, 2016.
/s/ John H. Rich III
U.S. Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?