BISHOP v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS LLC et al

Filing 24

ORDER denying 2 Motion to Certify Class and dismissing 19 Motion to Expedite Ruling on Class Certification filed by HARRY C BISHOP, III; and adopting 20 Report and Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (ccs)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE HARRY C. BISHOP, III, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS LLC, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) 2:16-cv-00172-JAW ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on May 24, 2016 his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 20). The Plaintiff filed his objections to the Recommended Decision on June 8, 2016 (ECF No. 21). I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is further ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion to Certify Class (ECF No. 2) be and hereby is DENIED without prejudice. 3. It is further ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion to Expedite Ruling on Class Certification (ECF No. 19) be and hereby is DISMISSED as moot. 4. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims based on Defendants’ medical care and special diet practices be and hereby are DISMISSED. 5. It is further ORDERED that Defendants Correct Care Solutions, Wendy Riebe, and Robert Clinton, M.D. be dismissed as Defendants. 6. It is further ORDERED that service be made on the remaining Defendants for the remaining claims. SO ORDERED. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 24th day of June, 2016 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?