BISHOP v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS LLC et al
Filing
24
ORDER denying 2 Motion to Certify Class and dismissing 19 Motion to Expedite Ruling on Class Certification filed by HARRY C BISHOP, III; and adopting 20 Report and Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (ccs)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
HARRY C. BISHOP, III,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS LLC, )
et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
2:16-cv-00172-JAW
ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on May 24,
2016 his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 20).
The Plaintiff filed his
objections to the Recommended Decision on June 8, 2016 (ECF No. 21). I
have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended
Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo
determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's
Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the
United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his
Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is
necessary.
1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the
Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.
2. It is further ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion to Certify Class
(ECF No. 2) be and hereby is DENIED without prejudice.
3. It is further ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion to Expedite
Ruling on Class Certification (ECF No. 19) be and hereby is
DISMISSED as moot.
4. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims based on Defendants’
medical care and special diet practices be and hereby are
DISMISSED.
5. It is further ORDERED that Defendants Correct Care Solutions,
Wendy Riebe, and Robert Clinton, M.D. be dismissed as
Defendants.
6. It is further ORDERED that service be made on the remaining
Defendants for the remaining claims.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr.
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 24th day of June, 2016
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?