US BANK TRUST NA v. AKEY
Filing
23
ORDER ADOPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The Plaintiff's motion for default judgment 13 is GRANTED. The Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause no later than February 8, 2017, why Counts II, III, IV, and V of its Complaint (ECF No. 1) should not be DISMISSED as MOOT. By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (akr)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., as Trustee for
LSF9 Master Participation Trust,
Plaintiff,
v.
KAREN J. AKEY,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:16-cv-00414-JDL
ORDER ADOPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge filed his Recommended Decision (ECF
No. 22) with the court on December 26, 2016, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636 (b)(1)(B)
and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). The time within which to file objections
expired on January 10, 2017, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate
Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo
review and appeal.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate
Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment (ECF No.
13) is GRANTED. The Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause no later than
February 8, 2017, why Counts II, III, IV, and V of its Complaint (ECF No. 1) should
not be DISMISSED as MOOT. A Judgment shall issue thereafter. I further
DIRECT that U.S. Bank is responsible for recording an attested copy of the
Judgment and for paying the appropriate recording fees.
SO ORDERED.
Dated this 1st day of February 2017.
/s/Jon D. Levy
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?