SHEIKH v. STATE OF MAINE
Filing
14
ORDER adopting 12 Report and Recommended Decision for 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by RAHMA SHEIKH; dismissing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
RAHMA SHEIKH,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF MAINE,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:16-cv-00638-JAW
ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on June 29,
2017 his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 12).
The Petitioner filed her
objections to the Recommended Decision on July 13, 2017 (ECF No. 13). I
have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended
Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo
determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s
Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the
United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his
Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is
necessary.
1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the
Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 12) be and hereby is AFFIRMED.
2. It is further ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of
Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) be and hereby is DISMISSED.
3. It is further ORDERED that no certificate of appealability should
issue in the event the Petitioner files a notice of appeal because
there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional
right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
SO ORDERED.
/s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr.
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 28th day of August, 2017
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?