TRUMAN v. ARMSTRONG et al
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE mooting 6 Motion for Order; mooting 8 Motion for Contempt ; mooting 9 Motion for Oral Argument/Hearing; adopting 12 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (ccs)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
PETER P. TRUMAN,
CIVIL NO. 2:17-CV-04-DBH
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION
OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On August 11, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the
court, with a copy to the plaintiff, his Order Granting Leave to Proceed In Forma
Pauperis and Recommended Dismissal of Case. The time within which to file
objections expired on August 25, 2017, and no objection has been filed. The
Magistrate Judge notified the plaintiff that failure to object would waive his right
to de novo review and appeal.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate
Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) because it seeks monetary relief from defendants
who are immune from such relief and fails to state a claim as to which relief can
be granted. The plaintiff’s subsequent filings styled as motions for contempt
(ECF No. 8) and for a hearing (ECF No. 9), as well as any relief requested in his
filings styled as correspondence (ECF Nos. 6, 10, and 11), are MOOT.
DATED THIS 31ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2017
/S/D. BROCK HORNBY
D. BROCK HORNBY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?