INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE v. MURPHY
Filing
12
ORDER ON BANKRUPTCY APPEAL re: 1 Bankruptcy Appeal; 5 Motion for Certification for Direct Appeal to First Circuit; 11 Motion to Extend Time By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mjlt)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,
APPELLANT
V.
WILLIAM CHARLES MURPHY,
APPELLEE
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL NO. 2:17-CV-17-DBH
ORDER ON BANKRUPTCY APPEAL
Upon the parties’ joint request pursuant to their Agreement Modifying
Settlement Agreement as to Damages (with Certain Rights Reserved) (ECF No. 81, ¶ 4) attached as Exhibit 1 to Appellee’s Opposition to Appellant’s Request for
Certification of Direct Appeal (ECF No. 8), and without the need for any briefing
or argument, I hereby summarily AFFIRM the Amended Final Judgment entered
by the bankruptcy court on January 4, 2017, Murphy v. Internal Revenue
Service, Ch. 7 Case No. 05-22363, Adv. No. 11-2020 (ECF No. 283). I do so
based upon my September 7, 2016, Decision and Order on Bankruptcy Appeal
when the case was last before this court, Internal Revenue Service v. Murphy,
2:16-cv-08-DBH (ECF No. 19). The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. As
a result, the IRS’s Request for Certification for Direct Appeal to First Circuit
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d) and Bankruptcy Rule 8006 (ECF No. 5) is MOOT.
The Unopposed Request to Extend Briefing Schedule (ECF No. 11) is also MOOT.
SO ORDERED.
DATED THIS 13TH DAY OF APRIL, 2017
/S/D. BROCK HORNBY
D. BROCK HORNBY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?