WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. OLSEN et al

Filing 10

ORDER denying 9 Motion for Default Judgment. By June 30, 2017, Wells Fargo shall notify me in writing whether it intends to go forward with a default judgment hearing on Counts II-V of the Complaint or whether it will seek dismissal of its Complaint without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41. By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (MMB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE WELLS FARGO BANK, National Association, as Trustee for SRMOF II 2011-1 Trust, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT R. OLSEN and SHARRI A. OLSEN, Defendant and SAND CANYON CORPORATION f/k/a OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Party-in-Interest ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Docket No. 2:17-cv-024-NT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER Before me is Wells Fargo National Association’s (“Wells Fargo”) motion for default judgment seeking a damages hearing on the mortgage foreclosure count in the Complaint. Complaint—Count I (ECF No. 1). Based on my initial review of the Complaint and the documents supporting the Complaint, it does not appear that Selene Finance had proper title to the mortgage when it assigned the mortgage to Wells Fargo on January 28, 2012. Complaint ¶ 14; Complaint Ex. H. Because Selene Finance did not have proper title, its assignment to Wells Fargo appears to be invalid. By June 30, 2017, Wells Fargo shall notify me in writing whether it intends to go forward with a default judgment hearing on the other counts in its Complaint or whether it will seek dismissal of its Complaint without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. The motion for default judgment is DENIED without prejudice. SO ORDERED. /s/ Nancy Torresen United States Chief District Judge Dated this 8th day of June, 2017.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?