RUFFIN v. HINKLEY et al

Filing 23

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE - adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 22 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (mnw)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
DANIEL ONEIL RUFFIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN HINKLEY, et al.,
Defendants

)
)
)
)
)
) Docket no. 2:17-cv-151-NT
)
)
)
)

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION
OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On August 25, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court,
with a copy to the Plaintiff, his Recommended Decision after a preliminary review of
the Plaintiff’s Complaint under 28 U.S.C.§ 1915. Recommended Decision (ECF No.
22). The time within which to file objections has expired, and no objections have been
filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the Plaintiff that failure to object would waive
their right to de novo review and appeal.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate
Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The Plaintiff’s claims regarding access to the courts
and the denial of adequate meals are DISMISSED and I ORDER service of the
complaint, the amended complaint, and the supplement to the amended complaint on
the Defendants Warren Heath, Dennis Palmer, John Hinkley, Cynthia Gardner, and
Timothy McFarland.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Nancy Torresen
United States Chief District Judge
Dated this 2nd day of October, 2017.