GOOZEY v. LANDRY

Filing 17

ORDER AFFIRMING 11 RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by STEVEN R GOOZEY. No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0. By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (ccs)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

STEVEN R. GOOZY
Petitioner,
v.
SCOTT LANDRY,
Respondent.

Docket No. 2:17-cv-181-NT

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED
DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On October 11, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the
court, with copy to the Petitioner, his Recommended Decision. Recommended
Decision (ECF No. 11). The Petitioner filed an objection to the Recommended
Decision on December 19, 2017 (ECF No. 16). I have reviewed and considered
the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de
novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision.
I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Defendant’s 28 U.S.C. §
2254 Petition (ECF No. 1) be and hereby is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is
further ORDERED that no certificate of appealability should issue in the event
the Petitioner files a notice of appeal because there is no substantial showing
of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. §
2253(c)(2).
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Nancy Torresen
United States Chief District Judge
Dated this 5th of January, 2018.