GROSS v. LANDRY et al

Filing 20

ORDER affirming 19 Report and Recommended Decision re: 1 Complaint By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (ccs)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
BRANDON GROSS,
Plaintiff,
v.
SCOTT LANDRY, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:17-cv-00297-JAW

ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
No objection having been filed to the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended
Decision filed November 17, 2017 (ECF No. 19), the Recommended Decision
is accepted.
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended
Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo
determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s
Recommended Decision and I concur with the recommendations of the United
States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended
Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.
Accordingly, is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s claims against
Defendants Bailey, Brown, Carr, James, Lussier, Reed, Segler, Shipman and
Welch be dismissed. It is further ORDERED that the Complaint (ECF No. 1)
pursuant to U.S.C. § 1915(d) be served on Defendants Clinton, Freeman,
Landry, McDonough, Riebe and Correct Care Solutions, LLC on Plaintiffs’

deliberate indifference claim and Plaintiff’s discrimination claims under the
American with Disabilities Act and the Maine Human Rights Act.
SO ORDERED.

/s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr.
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 18th day of December, 2017

2