ADAMS v. POLAND SPRING WATER CO OWNER et al
Filing
16
AMENDED ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 13 Motion to Reopen Case; Report and Recommended Decision re 14 Report and Recommendations By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mjlt)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
JUSTAN ADAMS,
PLAINTIFF
V.
POLAND SPRING WATER CO.
OWNER, ET AL.,
DEFENDANT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL NO. 2:17-CV-355-DBH
AMENDED ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION
OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE1
On June 6, 2019, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court,
with a copy to the plaintiff, his Recommended Decision on Motion to Reopen.
The time within which to file an objection expired on June 20, 2019, and no
objection has been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the plaintiff that failure
to object would waive his right to de novo review and appeal.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate
Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The plaintiff’s motion to reopen the case is DENIED.
I hereby place Justan Adams on Notice that filing restrictions “may be in
the offing.” Cok v. Family Court of Rhode Island, 985 F.2d 32, 35 (1st Cir. 1993).
This represents the “cautionary order” of which Cok speaks. Id. Groundless and
inappropriate filings will not be tolerated.
SO ORDERED.
DATED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2019
/S/D. BROCK HORNBY
D. BROCK HORNBY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The Order issued July 8, 2019, is amended to correct the spelling of the plaintiff’s first name
to “Justan” instead of “Justin.”
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?