ADAMS v. POLAND SPRING WATER CO OWNER et al

Filing 16

AMENDED ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 13 Motion to Reopen Case; Report and Recommended Decision re 14 Report and Recommendations By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mjlt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE JUSTAN ADAMS, PLAINTIFF V. POLAND SPRING WATER CO. OWNER, ET AL., DEFENDANT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 2:17-CV-355-DBH AMENDED ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE1 On June 6, 2019, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with a copy to the plaintiff, his Recommended Decision on Motion to Reopen. The time within which to file an objection expired on June 20, 2019, and no objection has been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the plaintiff that failure to object would waive his right to de novo review and appeal. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The plaintiff’s motion to reopen the case is DENIED. I hereby place Justan Adams on Notice that filing restrictions “may be in the offing.” Cok v. Family Court of Rhode Island, 985 F.2d 32, 35 (1st Cir. 1993). This represents the “cautionary order” of which Cok speaks. Id. Groundless and inappropriate filings will not be tolerated. SO ORDERED. DATED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2019 /S/D. BROCK HORNBY D. BROCK HORNBY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The Order issued July 8, 2019, is amended to correct the spelling of the plaintiff’s first name to “Justan” instead of “Justin.” 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?