WHITE v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY et al

Filing 73

ORDER ON MOTIONS TO AMEND PLEADINGS re 62 Motion for Leave to File; 70 Motion to Amend. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (jib)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
MATTHEW J. WHITE,

PLAINTIFF
V.

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE
COMPANY,
DEFENDANT

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL NO. 2:17-CV-491-DBH

ORDER ON MOTIONS TO AMEND PLEADINGS
The plaintiff may amend his Opposing and Additional Statement of
Material Facts in Opposition to Summary Judgment (ECF No. 56) by March 15,
2019, as he has proposed in his Response to Defendant’s Motion for Leave (ECF
No. 62) With Corresponding Motion for Leave to Amend ECF No. 56 (ECF No. 69).
The defendant may then reply by April 1, 2019, as it has proposed in its Reply
in Support of its Motion for Leave to Respond to Additional Facts Raised in
Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Statement of Material Facts (ECF No. 72).
This disposes of the motions in ECF Nos. 62 and 70.
The summary judgment proceedings in this case have become the poster
child for why the lawyers should have a pre-filing conference with the judge so
as to avoid this kind of wasteful exchange.
SO ORDERED.
DATED THIS 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019
/S/D. BROCK HORNBY
D. BROCK HORNBY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE