USA v. WILLIAMSON
Filing
16
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 15 Report and Recommendations; granting 1 Petition to Enforce IRS Summons By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (jib)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PETITIONER
V.
ANDREW WILLIAMSON,
RESPONDENT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL NO. 2:18-MC-101-DBH
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION
OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On October 4, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the
court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on Petition to
Enforce IRS Summons.
The time within which to file objections expired on
October 18, 2018, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge
notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review
and appeal.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate
Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The court finds find that the government has complied
with all statutory requirements necessary to support the administrative summons
and that Andrew Williamson has unjustifiably failed to comply with the same. I
GRANT the Petition and ORDER Andrew Williamson, with respect to the relevant
summons tax periods, to produce the requested documents (i.e., the documents
described in the summons) to IRS Revenue Officer Meredith West, or any other
officer of the IRS, at the office of the IRS, 220 Maine Mall Road, South Portland,
Maine 04106, within seven (7) days of this Order. I caution Andrew Williamson that
failure to comply with the Court’s Order within the deadline set in the Order could
result in a finding that he is in contempt of court and he could be subject to arrest
for purposes of a compulsory hearing pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7604(b).
SO ORDERED.
DATED THIS 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2018
/S/D. BROCK HORNBY
D. BROCK HORNBY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?