DOUCETTE v. MAGNUSSON
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE adopting 8 Report and Recommendations re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by JEFFREY DOUCETTE. No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (clp)
Case 2:20-cv-00198-DBH Document 9 Filed 02/16/21 Page 1 of 1
PageID #: 62
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
CIVIL NO. 2:20-CV-198-DBH
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION
OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On January 29, 2021, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the
court, with copies to counsel, his Recommended Decision on 28 U.S.C. § 2554
Petition. The time within which to file objections expired on February 12, 2021,
and no objection has been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that
failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate
Judge is hereby ADOPTED.
The motion for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED without
an evidentiary hearing. No certificate of appealability pursuant to Rule 11 of the
Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases shall issue because there is no substantial
showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.
DATED THIS 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021
/S/D. BROCK HORNBY
D. BROCK HORNBY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?