LAMORE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER

Filing 19

ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION accepting 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 11 SOCIAL SECURITY BRIEF by KATHERINE LAMORE By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (CCS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE KATHERINE L., Plaintiff, v. MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security , Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:23-cv-00354-JAW ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION On January 18, 2024, Katherine L. filed a motion requesting the Court vacate the decision of the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) Commissioner and remand her case for a new hearing. Pl.’s Opening Brief (ECF No. 11). On February 16, 2024, the SSA Commissioner responded in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion. Comm’r’s Soc. Sec. Resp. Brief (ECF No. 13). Plaintiff replied on February 28, 2024. Reply Brief (ECF No. 14). The United States Magistrate Judge filed her Report and Recommended Decision on July 31, 2024. Report and Recommended Decision (ECF No. 18) (Recommended Decision). Neither party objected to the Recommended Decision. The Court reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, together with the entire record. The Court made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision and concurs with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in her Recommended Decision and determines that no further proceeding is necessary. Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 18) and thereby VACATES the Commissioner’s Decision and REMANDS the case for further proceedings. SO ORDERED. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 24th day of September, 2024 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?