Bond v. Blum, et al

Filing 306

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 305 Motion of plaintiff to Reconsider Orders of May 12, 2014 with Request for Evidentiary Hearing. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 5/27/14. (c/m 5/28/14 jnls, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 5/28/2014 (jnls, Deputy Clerk).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND WILLIAM C. BOND * Plaintiff * vs. * KENNETH BLUM, SR., et al. * Defendants CIVIL ACTION NO. MJG-01-2600 * * * * * * * * * * MEMORANDUM AND ORDER The Court has before it Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider Orders of May 12, 2014 with Request for Evidentiary Hearing [Document 305]. The Court finds that neither a response nor a hearing is necessary. The instant motion is the latest in a series of pro se filings making allegations against the undersigned Judge, other judges, and attorneys. The undersigned Judge knows that the allegations against him are baseless1 and is aware of no reason why the allegations against the other judges and the attorneys are worthy of any credibility. Should an appellate court, or other entity with jurisdiction, require a more detailed response specifically refuting Plaintiff's false statements, one shall be provided. 1 2600. See, e.g., Memorandum and Order [Document 108] in MJG-01- However, the undersigned Judge finds no need to devote further time to Plaintiff's harassment. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider Orders of May 12, 2014 with Request for Evidentiary Hearing [Document 305] is DENIED. SO ORDERED, on Tuesday, May 27, 2014. /s/__________ Marvin J. Garbis United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?