Jackson v. State of Maryland et al

Filing 15

MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge J. Frederick Motz on 6/30/10. (hmls, Deputy Clerk)

Download PDF
Jackson v. State of Maryland et al Doc. 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND SHARON JACKSON v. STATE OF MARYLAND, ET AL. * * * * * * ****** MEMORANDUM Plaintiff has brought this action for employment discrimination against the State of Maryland Department of Budget and Management ("DBM") and various individuals who were her managers or supervisors at DBM. Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss to which plaintiff has responded. The motion will be granted. The reasons for this ruling may be briefly stated. 1. As plaintiff now concedes, the claim she asserts under the Americans With Disabilities Act is barred by the Eleventh Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. 2. As plaintiff likewise concedes, her claim for religious discrimination is barred by virtue of the fact that she did not check the box noted "religion" on her EEOC charge. 3. Although plaintiff does not so concede, her claims against the individual defendants are likewise clearly barred by the fact that she did not name them in her EEOC charge. 4. Plaintiff's sole remaining claim, a Title VII claim for race-based harassments against DBM, fails because she has alleged no underlying facts that make such a claim plausible. See generally Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007); Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937 (2009). Her averments are entirely conclusory in nature. The facts alleged by plaintiff give rise to an equally reasonable inference that plaintiff's supervisors were critical of plaintiff because they were not satisfied with her work performance. Civil No. ­ JFM-10-463 1 Dockets.Justia.com A separate order granting defendants' motion to dismiss is being entered herewith.1 Date: June 30, 2010 /s/ J. Frederick Motz United States District Judge 1 Because plaintiff's claims otherwise fail, I need not address defendant's additional argument that plaintiff failed to properly serve any of the defendants with process. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?