King v Bayfriend

Filing 2

MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge William D Quarles, Jr on 8/25/10. (das, Deputy Clerk)(c/m 8/25/10-das)

Download PDF
King v Bayfriend Doc. 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND MAURY LEE KING, v. YOLANDA BAYFRIEND : : : : : : ..oOo.. CIVIL ACTION NO. WDQ-10-2142 MEMORANDUM On August 5, 2010, Maury King, filed the instant pro se complaint stating the facts as follows: "Yolanda's husband, I am feeling bad really body health medication sleeping because [illegible] hurt myself. Yolanda know better really Yolanda love you. How feeling myself [Illegible] rice anything be sorry [illegible] Yolanda stay with me at her know good to me lots help her accept myself." Paper No. 1. Plaintiff has neither paid the civil filing fee nor filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. A complaint that is totally implausible or frivolous may be dismissed sua sponte for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to FED R. CIV. P 12 (b)(1). See Apple v. Glenn, 183 F.3d 477 (6th Cir. 1999) cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1198 (2000); O=Connor v. United States, 159 F.R.D. 22 (D. Md. 1994); see also Crowley Cutlery Co. v. United States, 849 F.2d 273, 277 (7th Cir. 1988) (federal district judge has authority to dismiss a frivolous suit on his own initiative). Accordingly, this case is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. A separate order follows this memorandum. Date: August 25, 2010 /s/ William D. Quarles, Jr. United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?