Hankins v. CarMax, Inc. et al

Filing 30

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 26 Motion to Stay Enforcement of Court's Order on Remand. Signed by Judge Richard D Bennett on 1/13/12. (hmls, Deputy Clerk)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
REGINA HANKINS,

*

Plaintiff,

*

v.

*

CARMAX, INC., et al.

*

Defendants.
*

*

*

Civil Action No. RDB-11-03685

*
*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

MEMORANDUM ORDER
On January 11, 2012, this Court held a Motions Hearing in which it GRANTED in
part and DENIED in part Intervenor Plaintiff Barry A. Drake’s Motion to Remand and for
Sanctions (ECF No. 8). Specifically, this Court GRANTED the Motion to Remand and
DENIED the Motion for Sanctions. The next day, on January 12, 2011, this Court entered
an Order (ECF No. 24) remanding the case to the Circuit Court for Baltimore County and
declining to impose sanctions. On January 13, 2012, the Court issued a Memorandum
Opinion supplementing the reasons indicated on the record concerning its decision to
remand the case.
Subsequent to the issuance of the Remand Order (ECF No. 24), Defendants filed a
Motion to Stay Enforcement of Court’s Order on Remand (ECF No. 26). Pursuant to this
Court’s decision on the record during the January 11, 2012 hearing and the Order entered on
January 12, 2012, this Court no longer has jurisdiction over this matter. Additionally, for the

1

reasons stated in Intervenor Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants Motion to Stay Enforcement
of the Order, it is this 13th day of January 2012, ORDERED that:
1. Defendants’ Motion to Stay Enforcement of Court’s Order on Remand (ECF
No. 26) is DENIED;
2. The Clerk of the Court transmit copies of this Order and accompanying
Memorandum Opinion to Counsel;
3. The Clerk of the Court CLOSE THIS CASE.

Dated:

January 13, 2012

/s/________________________
Richard D. Bennett
United States District Judge

2