J.W. v. Corporal Carrier et al
Filing
69
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 68 Motion to Alter/Amend Judgment. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 6/2/2015. (hmls, Deputy Clerk)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
J.W.
*
Plaintiff
*
vs.
*
CORPORAL CARRIER, et al.
*
Defendants
*
*
*
CIVIL ACTION NO. MJG-13-2386
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
The Court has before it Plaintiff's Motion For This Court
To Reconsider Its Decision to Grant Defendants' Motion for
Summary Judgment on May 4, 2015 Or Schedule a Hearing In The
Alternative [Document 68].
The Court finds that neither a
response nor a hearing is necessary.
As stated by Judge Ramsey in Weyerhaeuser Corp. v. Koppers
Co., Inc.:
A motion for reconsideration (or, to alter
or
amend
judgment)
made
pursuant
to
Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) may be made for one of
three reasons: (1) an intervening change in
the
controlling
law
has
occurred,
(2)
evidence not previously available has become
available, or (3) it is necessary to correct
a clear error of law or prevent manifest
injustice.
771 F. Supp. 1406, 1419 (D. Md. 1991); see also Pac. Ins. Co. v.
Am. Nat. Fire Ins. Co., 148 F.3d 396, 403 (4th Cir. 1998).
Such
a motion "cannot be used to raise arguments which could, and
should, have been made before [the determination on which
reconsideration is sought was] issued."
Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.
v. Meyer, 781 F.2d 1260, 1268 (7th Cir. 1986).
Stated
differently, "'[a] motion to reconsider is not a license to
reargue the merits or present new evidence.'"
Gray-Hopkins v.
Prince George's Cnty., Md., 201 F. Supp. 2d 523, 524 (D. Md.
2002) (citation omitted).
The instant Motion meets none of the criteria upon which a
properly court may reconsider a prior determination.
Moreover,
to the extent there is anything in the instant Motion beyond a
restatement of the basic arguments already presented, it does
not add any weight to the arguments rejected in the decision at
issue.
SO ORDERED, on Tuesday, June 02, 2015.
/s/__________
Marvin J. Garbis
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?