Zervitz v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge J. Frederick Motz on 10/24/13. (apls, Deputy Clerk)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
SAMUEL A. ZERVITZ
v.
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK
*
*
*
*
*
*
******
Civil No. – JFM-13-2499
MEMORANDUM
Plaintiff has filed a motion to remand. The motion has been fully briefed. It will be
granted.
I can imagine that if the issue presented had been raised in a different context, the parties
may have taken a different position than the one that they have taken in connection with the
motion to remand. Nevertheless, although the question is not entirely free from doubt, I am
satisfied that plaintiff did limit its claim for monetary damages, including any claim for
attorney’s fees, to $74,000. Therefore, the amount in controversy is not sufficiently large to
justify this court exercising jurisdiction over the case.
A separate order granting plaintiff’s motion to remand and remanding the case to the
Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland, is being entered herewith.
Date: October 24, 2013
__/s/______________
J. Frederick Motz
United States District Judge
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?