Shapiro v. McManus
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 144 Motion of Stephen M. Shapiro for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge James K. Bredar on 2/15/2017. (c/m 2/16/17 jnls, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 2/16/2017 (jnls, Deputy Clerk).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
(THREE JUDGE COURT)
O. JOHN BENISEK et al.
LINDA H. LAMONE et al.
CIVIL NO. JKB-13-3233
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Now pending before the Court is STEPHEN M. SHAPIRO’S MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION OF THIS COURT’S ORDER DENYING HIS MOTION TO
INTERVENE (ECF No. 144). The Three Judge Court has considered the Motion. Importantly,
the Court has specifically considered the document attached to the Motion, titled, MOVANT
OPPOSITION TO HIS MOTION TO INTERVENE (ECF No. 144-1), and the arguments and
authorities contained therein.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to docket the Movant’s proposed reply (ECF 144-1) as his
REPLY to the parties’ RESPONSES (ECF Nos. 121, 122).
For the reasons set out in its prior MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (ECF No. 130),
STEPHEN M. SHAPIRO’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THIS COURT’S
ORDER DENYING HIS MOTION TO INTERVENE (ECF No. 144) is DENIED. Judges
Niemeyer and Russell join in this Memorandum and Order.
DATED this 15th day of February, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
James K. Bredar
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?