Harris v. Baltimore City Police Department et al

Filing 64

MEMORANDUM Denying as Moot 47 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; Granting 54 Motion to Amend Complaint; Granting 55 Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend and Amended Complaint; Granting 56 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge J. Frederick Motz on 4/17/2015. (c/m 4/17/15 bas, Deputy Clerk)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND DARRELL P. HARRIS v. BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL. * * * * * * * ****** Civil No. – JFM-14-2470 MEMORANDUM Presently pending are various motions in this case. My rulings on the motions, and the reasons for them, are as follows. The motion to dismiss filed by Ulmer and Preston (document 47) is denied as moot in light of the fact that plaintiff has filed an amended complaint. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend complaint (document 54) is granted as to the remaining defendants. The motion to strike plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend (document 55) filed by defendants Batts and the Baltimore City Police Department is granted. The State defendants’ motion to strike amended complaint (document 56) is granted because plaintiff has not alleged facts giving rise to any Monell liability. Date: April 17, 2015 __/s/______________________ J. Frederick Motz United States District Judge 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?