Harris v. Baltimore City Police Department et al
Filing
64
MEMORANDUM Denying as Moot 47 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; Granting 54 Motion to Amend Complaint; Granting 55 Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend and Amended Complaint; Granting 56 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge J. Frederick Motz on 4/17/2015. (c/m 4/17/15 bas, Deputy Clerk)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
DARRELL P. HARRIS
v.
BALTIMORE CITY POLICE
DEPARTMENT, ET AL.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
******
Civil No. – JFM-14-2470
MEMORANDUM
Presently pending are various motions in this case. My rulings on the motions, and the
reasons for them, are as follows.
The motion to dismiss filed by Ulmer and Preston (document 47) is denied as moot in
light of the fact that plaintiff has filed an amended complaint.
Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend complaint (document 54) is granted as to the
remaining defendants.
The motion to strike plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend (document 55) filed by
defendants Batts and the Baltimore City Police Department is granted.
The State defendants’ motion to strike amended complaint (document 56) is granted
because plaintiff has not alleged facts giving rise to any Monell liability.
Date: April 17, 2015
__/s/______________________
J. Frederick Motz
United States District Judge
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?