Bowman v. Gross et al

Filing 15

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 13 Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge James K. Bredar on 9/17/2015. (c/m 9/17/2015 ca2s, Deputy Clerk)

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
GEARIE C. BOWMAN

*

Plaintiff

*

v

*

FRANK GROSS, et al.

*

Defendants

Civil Action No. JKB-14-4039

*
***
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Now pending before the Court is the DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS OR IN
THE ALTERNATIVE FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 13). The Plaintiff has not
responded to the Defendants’ Motion.
Upon consideration of the full record in the case, including especially the Defendants’
Memorandum of Law (ECF No. 13-1) and exhibits (ECF No. 13-2 through 13-8), and for the
reasons stated in the Defendants’ Memorandum of Law, the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED,
on both grounds proffered by the Defendants. Further, had the Court not concluded that the case
should be dismissed for the reasons proffered, then the Court would have granted the
Defendants’ alternative motion for summary judgment as the Court concludes that there is no
genuine issue of material fact presented in the record.
The Court having ordered that the Motion to Dismiss be granted, it further directs the
Clerk to CLOSE THIS CASE.

DATED this 17th day of September, 2015.

BY THE COURT:
/s/
James K. Bredar
United States District Judge

2