Burgess v. Baltimore Police Department et al
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 87 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 7/26/2016. (jnls, Deputy Clerk)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
BALTIMORE CITY POLICE
DEPARTMENT, et al.
Civil No. RDB-15-0834
Presently pending before this Court is the Motion for Protective Order (ECF#87) filed by
the Baltimore City Department of Social Services (“the Department”) in response to a subpoena
served upon it by the Defendants Ritz, Goldstein, Weese, Purtell, Lehmann, Patton, Neverdon and
Van Gelder. The subpoena requests documents relating to the four children of the murder victim
Michelle Dyson, specifically LaShawnda Roberts, Tawanda Dyson, Brian Rayney and Shabria
Williams. The Department has moved for a Protective Order to authorize the production of these
documents, pursuant to Md. Ann. Code, Human Services §1-201(a)(1).
Under Maryland law a court may order disclosure of these confidential records if there is a
“reasonable possibility that review of the records would result in discovery of relevant evidence.”
Baltimore City Dept. of Social Services v. Stein, 328 Md 1 (1992). These documents relate to
information provided by the children on the night and the morning following murder of their
mother on or about October 5, 1994. These documents are relevant to the issues in this case and
may result in the discovery of usable evidence.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this 26th day of July 2016 that the Motion for
Protective Order (ECF#87) is GRANTED as this Court finds that the Baltimore City Department
of Social Services records sought by the subject subpoena are relevant to this proceeding;
AND IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that these records are deemed
“confidential” within the scope of the Confidentiality Order already in place in this case and shall
therefore be reviewed and shared only by the parties and their attorneys for purposes of this
AND IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that the names of the reporters of these
documents be redacted, that the disclosed records be SEALED, and be produced on a rolling basis
over a 90 day period beginning on August 5, 2016.
Richard D. Bennett
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?