Otero v. Speciale et al

Filing 71

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying without prejudice Defendant Speciale's 54 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice Defendant The Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Center, LLC's 55 and 56 Motions in Limine; directing the parties may refile their respective motions or a line reinstating them by date set. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 8/17/2018. (dass, Deputy Clerk)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Chambers of GEORGE L. RUSSELL, III United States District Judge 101 West Lombard Street Baltimore, Maryland 21201 410-962-4055 August 17, 2018 MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL RE: Ronaldo Otero v. Alessandro C. Speciale, et al. Civil Action No. GLR-15-1305 Dear Counsel: Pending before the Court is Defendant Alessandro C. Speciale’s Motion in Limine to Preclude Testimony Regarding Certain Elements of Plaintiff’s Life Care Plan (ECF No. 54) and Defendant The Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Center, LLC’s Motions in Limine to Preclude Testimony Regarding Certain Elements of Plaintiff’s Life Care Plan (ECF Nos. 55, 56). After the parties filed their respective Motions, the Court granted the parties’ Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order and stayed the case. (ECF Nos. 59, 60). The deadline for all pretrial motions is now January 18, 2019, and the trial is now scheduled to begin on April 15, 2019. Accordingly, the Motions are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The parties may refile their respective Motions, or file a Line reinstating them, by the January 18, 2019 pretrial motions deadline. In addition, the Court encourages the parties to work together to stipulate to facts that are not in dispute. Despite the informal nature of this memorandum, it shall constitute an Order of the Court, and the Clerk is directed to docket it accordingly. Very truly yours, /s/ George L. Russell, III United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?