Evans v. Colvin
Filing
35
OPINION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie A Gallagher on 4/3/2016. (jnls, Deputy Clerk)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
CHAMBERS OF
STEPHANIE A. GALLAGHER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
101 WEST LOMBARD STREET
BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21201
(410) 962-7780
Fax (410) 962-1812
April 3, 2018
LETTER TO COUNSEL
RE:
Deborah Denise Evans v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration;1
Civil No. SAG-15-2243
Dear Counsel:
Arjun K. Murahari, Esq. has filed a motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Social
Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), in conjunction with his representation of Deborah D.
Evans before this Court. [ECF No. 32]. In response, the Social Security Administration
(“SSA”) asked this Court to consider whether Mr. Murahari’s requested amount constitutes a
reasonable fee. [ECF No. 33]. On March 8, 2018, Mr. Murahari filed a reply, which included a
letter from Ms. Evans regarding the character of Mr. Murahari’s representation. [ECF No. 34]. I
have considered those filings. No hearing is necessary. See Loc. R. 105.6 (D. Md. 2016). For
the reasons set forth below, Mr. Murahari’s motion for attorney’s fees is GRANTED IN PART
and DENIED IN PART.
On July 26, 2016, this Court awarded Mr. Murahari $3,950.63 for 20.25 hours worked on
Ms. Evans’s case in federal court. [ECF No. 22]. Ms. Evans subsequently received a revised
Award Notice, in which she was awarded $144,454.00 in past due benefits. [ECF No. 32]. The
SSA did not withhold twenty-five percent of Ms. Evans’s past due benefits, amounting to
$36,113.50. See id. On February 19, 2018, Mr. Murahari filed an Amended Motion for
Attorney’s Fees, seeking $36,113.50 in attorney’s fees, less $6,000.00 already paid for work at
the administrative level, or $30,113.50. Id. Mr. Murahari has agreed to deduct $3,905.63 in fees
previously received from the amount to be collected. Id. at 1-2; see Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535
U.S. 789, 796 (2002); Stephens ex rel. R.E. v. Astrue, 565 F.3d 131, 135 (4th Cir. 2009).
The Act authorizes a reasonable fee for successful representation before this Court, not to
exceed twenty-five percent of a claimant’s total past-due benefits. 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Although
contingent fee agreements are the “primary means by which fees are set” in Social Security
cases, a court must nevertheless perform an “independent check, to assure that they yield
reasonable results in particular cases.” Gisbrecht, 535 U.S. at 807. In determining whether a
request for attorney’s fees under section 406(b) is reasonable, the Supreme Court has explained
that a reviewing court may properly consider the “character of the representation and the results
1
Currently, the position of Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is vacant, and most duties are
fulfilled by Nancy A. Berryhill, Deputy Commissioner for Operations, performing the duties and functions not
reserved to the Commissioner of Social Security.
Deborah Denise Evans v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration;
Civil No. SAG-15-2243
April 3, 2018
Page 2
the representative received.” Id. Importantly, the Supreme Court acknowledged that a
contingent fee agreement would not result in a reasonable fee if the fee constituted a “windfall”
to the attorney. Id. at 808.
Here, Mr. Murahari and Ms. Evans entered into a contingent fee agreement, by which
Ms. Evans agreed to pay Mr. Murahari twenty-five percent of all retroactive benefits to which
she might become entitled. [ECF No. 20-3]. In his previous motion for attorney’s fees pursuant
to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), Mr. Murahari submitted an itemized report
documenting the 20.25 hours he expended before this Court in Ms. Evans’s case. [ECF Nos. 206, 20-7]. If Mr. Murahari receives the full amount of fees he requests, his fee for representation
before this Court will effectively total $1,783.38 per hour. Mr. Murahari must therefore show
that an effective rate of $1,783.38 per hour is reasonable for the services he rendered. See
Gisbrecht, 535 U.S. at 807.
Notably, Mr. Murahari’s requested fee results in nearly six times the top hourly rate that
is presumptively reasonable for attorneys of his experience level pursuant to the fee guidelines
appended to the Local Rules of this Court.2 Although it is customary in Social Security cases for
courts to approve significantly higher rates, Mr. Murahari’s requested rate far exceeds the typical
rate awarded by courts in the Fourth Circuit for attorney’s fees in successful Social Security
appeals. See, e.g., Melvin v. Colvin, No. 5:10-CV-160-FL, 2013 WL 3340490 (E.D.N.C. July 2,
2013) (approving contingency fee agreement with hourly rate of $1,043.70); Claypool v.
Barnhart, 294 F. Supp. 2d 829, 833 (S.D.W. Va. 2003) (approving contingency fee agreement
with hourly rate of $1,433.12); Lehman v. Colvin, Civil No. SAG-12-2160 (D. Md. July 7, 2016)
(unpublished) (approving contingency fee agreement with hourly rate of $1,028.14). While this
Court notes Mr. Murahari’s effective performance and the substantial past-due benefit award to
his client, Mr. Murahari’s request for $30,113.50 for 20.25 hours in this case would result in a
windfall. Instead, this Court finds that an award of $20,250.00, amounting to an hourly rate of
$1,000.00—slightly more than triple the top hourly rate for an attorney of Mr. Murahari’s
experience, would adequately compensate Mr. Murahari for the time that he spent on this case in
this Court. See Hunter v. Comm’r, Soc. Sec. Admin., Civil No. SAG-15-3758 (D. Md. Nov. 16,
2017) (unpublished) (approving contingency fee agreement with hourly rate of $1,140.41, while
noting that the requested rate was “slightly more than triple the top hourly rate” for an attorney
with eleven years of experience).
For the reasons set forth herein, this Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Mr.
Murahari’s motion for attorney’s fees, [ECF No. 32]. This Court will award Mr. Murahari
attorney’s fees totaling $20,250.00. Because Mr. Murahari already received the $3,905.63 in
fees awarded pursuant to the EAJA, Ms. Evans is directed to send the remaining amount,
$16,344.37, to Mr. Murahari.
2
Although they do not govern Social Security cases, the Local Rules prescribe guidelines for determining attorney’s
fees in certain cases, which are instructive in evaluating the reasonableness of the effective hourly rate in this case.
See Loc. R. App’x B (D. Md. 2016). For attorneys admitted to the bar for a period of five (5) to eight (8) years, like
Mr. Murahari, the presumptively reasonable hourly rate is between $165.00 and $300.00 per hour. Id.
Deborah Denise Evans v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration;
Civil No. SAG-15-2243
April 3, 2018
Page 3
Despite the informal nature of this letter, it should be flagged as an opinion.
implementing order follows.
Sincerely yours,
/s/
Stephanie A. Gallagher
United States Magistrate Judge
An
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?