Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc. v. J.A.B.-Columbia, Inc. et al
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 16 MOTION to Dismiss Count III of the Counterclaim. Signed by Judge J. Frederick Motz on 3/7/2016. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
CHAMBERS OF
101 WEST LOMBARD STREET
BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21201
(410) 962-0782
(410) 962-2698 FAX
J. FREDERICK MOTZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
March 7, 2016
MEMO TO COUNSEL RE: Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc. v. J.A.B. Columbia, et al.
Civil No. ELH-15-3075
Dear Counsel:
Because of a temporary imbalance of workload, I am ruling upon the motion to dismiss
count III of the counterclaim for Judge Hollander.
The motion (document 16) is granted. The parties dispute various matters concerning
whether defendant has met Rule 9(b)’s heightened pleading standard, including the content of
misrepresentations made to defendant, the identity of the person who made the
misrepresentations and the identity of the persons to whom the misrepresentations were made.
What is clear, however, is that nothing in count III of the counterclaim alleges that at the time
that plaintiff made the alleged misrepresentations, it knew of their falsity or that it was recklessly
indifferent to the truth of what it said. Such a difference as to state of mind is essential to a fraud
claim. See Learning Works, Inc. v. The Learning Annex, Inc., 830 F.2d 541, 546 (4th Cir. 1987),
and the absence of such an allegation is fatal to count III.
Despite the informal nature of this letter, it should be flagged as an opinion and docketed
as an order.
Very truly yours,
/s/
J. Frederick Motz
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?