Mitchell v. Lowes Store #0424
MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 10/25/2017. (c/m 10/25/17 bas, Deputy Clerk)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
LOWE’S HOME CENTERS, LLC
Civil No. CCB-16-590
This is a pro se action for employment discrimination. Discovery has been completed,
and defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment. After being advised of the
consequences of a failure to do so, plaintiff has not responded to the motion. The motion will be
Plaintiff, Brian Mitchell, has produced no direct or indirect evidence of race-based
animus on the part of defendant Lowe’s Home Cengters, LLC (“Lowe’s) in terminating his
employment. Likewise, he has not met his burden of proof through the burden-shifting
framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973). Plaintiff’s employment
was terminated on October 17, 2014 after a customer reported that she had asked plaintiff about
having Lowe’s install a door for her, and plaintiff responded by telling her that his father, a
contractor, could do the work instead. This response violated a policy of defendant that
prohibited employees of defendant from seeking business opportunities from defendant for their
personal benefit. Plaintiff admitted that he did so.
Plaintiff’s only argument about disparate treatment of a comparator is that a department
manager in the section in which he worked violated policy in the same way plaintiff did. That is,
the other employee often took calls on his personal cell phone from his “customers.” However,
plaintiff has no information as to what the other employee was doing on the phone. The
customers to whom the other employee, a manager, was speaking might have been purchasing
items from Lowe’s and giving the employee their orders.
Plaintiff has failed to support his claim of racial discrimination in the termination of his
employment. Accordingly, defendant’s motion for summary judgment will be granted.
A separate Order follows.
Date: October 25, 2017
Catherine C. Blake
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?