Seeram v. U.S. Bank National Association

Filing 9

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER directing the Order of the bankruptcy court granting relief from stay is hereby Affirmed. This appeal is Dismissed. Signed by Chief Judge Catherine C. Blake on 2/10/2017. (c/m chambers)(jnls, Deputy Clerk)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND IN RE CHRISTINE SEERAM : : v. : CIVIL NO. CCB-16-3353 : U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION : ...o0o... MEMORANDUM and ORDER Christine Seeram appeals from the final Order of the bankruptcy court granting relief from stay (BK. Dkt. 29 & 30) in September 2016.1 That Order apparently was granted in light of the fact that Ms. Seeram did not attend a September 22, 2016, hearing on the motion to grant relief from stay; had a total debt of $459,000; had failed to make payments since 2009 such that her arrears were approximately $201,000; and the real property in question had a value of about $200,000. While Ms. Seeram challenges the standing of U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, and Ocwen Loan Servicing, she acknowledged their status in papers filed with the bankruptcy court. (Brief of Appellee, Exs. 3 and 4). Further, the Bank has provided a copy of the assignment from Fieldstone Mortgage to the Bank, as Trustee, c/o Ocwen Loan Servicing. (Brief of Appellee, Ex. 2). No persuasive legal or factual basis to disagree with the decision of Chief Bankruptcy Judge Nancy Alquist has been presented by Ms. Seeram. Accordingly, the Order of the bankruptcy court granting relief from stay is hereby Affirmed. This appeal is Dismissed. 1 Ms. Seeram filed for bankruptcy on July 22, 2016, the date set for a foreclosure sale of her home, thus triggering the automatic stay. SO ORDERED this 10th day of February, 2017. /S/ Catherine C. Blake United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?