Burris v. Clocker et al
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge James K. Bredar on 12/4/2017. (kw2s, Deputy Clerk)(c/m 12.5.17)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
*
TINIKA BURRIS
*
Plaintiff
*
v.
*
JOSEPH CLOCKER, et al.
Defendants
*
*
CIVIL NO. JKB-17-0659
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
MEMORANDUM
Now pending before the Court is the Defendants’ MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 14).
The Defendant requested a lengthy extension of the deadline for her response (ECF No. 16), and
that request was granted (ECF No. 17). The Clerk also sent the Plaintiff the standard letter for
pro se litigants advising as to the significance of a motion to dismiss and the potential adverse
consequences should the motion be granted (ECF No. 15). The Plaintiff has not responded to the
motion to dismiss.
The Court has carefully reviewed the motion to dismiss and the legal argument submitted
in support thereof.
The Court agrees with the Defendants’ analysis and adopts it herein.
Accordingly, by accompanying order, the MOTION (ECF No. 14) will be GRANTED, the case
will be DISMISSED, and the Clerk will be directed to CLOSE THIS MATTER.
DATED this 4th day of December, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
____________/s/______________________
James K. Bredar
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?