Marshall v. University of Maryland Medical Center
Filing
38
ORDER re: Hippa Release. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie A Gallagher on 11/15/2018. (kw2s, Deputy Clerk)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
CHAMBERS OF
STEPHANIE A. GALLAGHER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
101 WEST LOMBARD STREET
BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21201
(410) 962-7780
Fax (410) 962-1812
November 15, 2018
LETTER TO COUNSEL
RE:
Sheila M. Marshall v. University of Maryland Medical Center,
Civil No. TDC-17-2779
Dear Counsel:
This matter has been referred to me for discovery disputes and related scheduling matters.
[ECF No. 16]. I am in receipt of Defendant University of Maryland Medical Center’s
(“UMMC”) Status Report regarding the subpoenas for medical records of Plaintiff Sheila M.
Marshall (“Ms. Marshall”). [ECF 37]. UMMC reports that a medical provider in possession of
records characterized as “mental health records” requires an authorization, “i.e., HIPAA release,”
from Ms. Marshall to respond to UMMC’s subpoena. Id. ¶ 4.
Because UMMC is entitled to records relevant to Ms. Marshall’s medical condition, as
addressed in my Order of August 6, 2018, [ECF 19], Ms. Marshall must allow access to those
records if she intends to present mental health arguments or evidence in support of her case.
Accordingly, on or before Tuesday, November 27, 2018, Ms. Marshall is ordered to advise this
Court whether she will authorize and/or sign a HIPAA release for the aforementioned medical
records requested by UMMC. If Ms. Marshall refuses to authorize release of these mental health
records, I will recommend to Judge Chuang that Ms. Marshall be precluded from presenting
evidence relating to any mental health conditions at trial.
Despite the informal nature of this letter, it should be flagged as an opinion and docketed
as an order.
Sincerely yours,
/s/
Stephanie A. Gallagher
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?