Prince v. USA - 2255

Filing 2

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying Defendant's Petition for Remand and Resentencing pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255; directing the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Chief Judge James K. Bredar on 10/4/2019. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (c/m 10/7/19-das)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * v. * ARTHUR RAYMOND PRINCE * Defendant * * CRIMINAL NO. JKB-18-0313 CIVIL NO. JKB-19-1591 * * * * * * * * * * * MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Now pending before the Court is the Defendant’s PETITION FOR REMAND AND RESENTENCING pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 110). The Government has responded (ECF No. 118) and the Defendant has sought additional time to reply (ECF No. 121), which the Court granted (ECF No. 127), an allowance with respect to which the Defendant failed to take advantage by the requisite deadline (see ECF No. 127). The Court has carefully reviewed all of the papers relevant to this Motion, as well as the full docket in the case. The Defendant has articulated insufficient grounds, facts, or arguments to warrant an evidentiary hearing or any other relief. Accordingly, for the reasons set out in the Government’s response (ECF No. 118), the Motion (ECF No. 110) is DENIED. Defendant has failed to meet the standard for a certificate of appealability. Accordingly, the Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. DATED this 4th day of October, 2019. BY THE COURT: ___________/s/_______________________ James K. Bredar Chief Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?