Benitez v. Masco Contractors Inc. et al

Filing 25

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 5/9/2022. (kb3s, Deputy Clerk)

Download PDF
Case 1:21-cv-00259-CCB Document 25 Filed 05/09/22 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND JOSE BENITEZ * * V. * Civil No. 1:21-cv-0259-CCB * MASCO CONTRACTORS INC., et al. * t 4:*4: 4! MEMORANDUM Pending before the court is a motion to set aside default judgment brought by defendants MASCO Contractors, Inc.("MASCO")and James Stadler. The matter has been fully briefed and no oral argument is necessary. See Local Rule 105(6)(D. Md. 2021). For the reasons discussed herein, the motion will be granted. BACKGROUND On February 1, 2021, Jose Benitez filed a complaint for unpaid or delayed wages and overtime for his installation work on the Rosemont/Dukeland housing complex project site in Baltimore that he completed for MASCO and Stadler between June 17 and September 17, 2019. (ECF 1, Compl. 19, 24, 27). Over the course of several months, Mr. Benitez attempted to serve the defendants at MASCO's principal office in Baltimore, Maryland, a location MASCO registered with the Maryland State Department of Assessments and Taxation; Stadler's personal residence in Kingsville, Maryland; and two locations in Florida where Mr. Benitez had reason to believe Stadler might be located.(ECF 7-1, Mot. for Alt. Serv., at 2-3). After these unsuccessful attempts, the court granted Mr. Benitez' motion for alternative service by mail complete upon delivery as to Mr. Stadler.(ECF 8, Order for Alternative Service). Alternative service was obtained Case 1:21-cv-00259-CCB Document 25 Filed 05/09/22 Page 2 of 5 Case 1:21-cv-00259-CCB Document 25 Filed 05/09/22 Page 3 of 5 Case 1:21-cv-00259-CCB Document 25 Filed 05/09/22 Page 4 of 5 Case 1:21-cv-00259-CCB Document 25 Filed 05/09/22 Page 5 of 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?